Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and diagnostic accuracy of different specimen preparation methods for the diagnosis of lung cancer from LNs (n = 213)

From: Clinical values of different specimen preparation methods for the diagnosis of lung cancer by EBUS-TBNA

 

Sensitivity, % (95% CI)

Specificity, % (95% CI)

PPV, % (95% CI)

NPV, %

(95% CI)

Diagnostic accuracy, % (95% CI)

χ2

p value

HP

89.0(83.4–93.3)

100(91.2–100)

100

67.8(57.9–76.3)

91.1(86.4–94.5)

  

TSC

83.8(77.5–88.9)

95.0(83.1–99.4)

98.6(94.9–99.6)

57.6(49.0-65.7)

85.9(80.5–90.3)

  

LBC

80.3(73.6–86.0)

97.5(86.8–99.9)

99.3(95.2–99.9)

53.3(45.8–60.9)

83.6(77.9–88.3)

5.51ā–¼

0.064ā–¼

HP + TSC

97.1(93.3–99.1)

95.0(83.1–99.4)

98.8(95.6–99.7)

86.4(76.2–94.8)

96.2(93.3–98.7)

21.15ā˜…

0.000ā˜…

HP + LBC

94.8(90.4–97.6)

97.5(86.8–99.9)

99.4(95.9–99.9)

81.2(69.6–89.1)

95.3(91.5–97.7)

18.03ā– 

0.000ā– 

HP + TSC + LBC

98.3(95.0-99.6)

92.5(79.6–98.4)

98.3(95.0-99.4)

92.5(80.0-97.4)

97.2(94.0–99.0)

1.04ā–³, 24.69ā–½

0.595ā–³, 0.000ā–½

  1. Abbreviations; PPV = Positive predictive value, NPV = Negative predictive value
  2. ā–¼Comparison of diagnostic accuracy among HP, TSC and LBC;
  3. ā˜…Comparison of diagnostic accuracy between combination of the two specimen preparation methods (HP + TSC) and any single specimen preparation method
  4. ā– Comparison of diagnostic accuracy between combination of the two specimen preparation methods (HP + LBC) and any single specimen preparation method
  5. ā–³Comparison of diagnostic accuracy among combination of the three specimen preparation methods and combination of the two specimen preparation methods
  6. ā–½Comparison of diagnostic accuracy between combination of the three specimen preparation methods and any single specimen preparation method