Skip to main content

Perinephric myxoid pseudotumor of fat – histopathological and molecular characterization of 3 cases after renal transplantation

Abstract

Background

Perinephric myxoid pseudotumor of fat (PMPF) is a rare benign pseudo-neoplastic proliferation of the perinephric and renal sinus adipose tissue. Its pathogenesis is thought to be a reactive process typically associated with neoplastic and non-neoplastic end-stage kidney disease. The distinctive histopathological feature of PMPF is a myxoid process comprising bland, spindled stromal cells interspersed with mature adipose tissue. Macroscopically, it is characterized by tumorous lipomatous remodeling of the kidney, which may raise concerns of malignancy on imaging. To date, only seven cases of PMPF have been documented in the context of kidney transplantation.

Case presentation

This report describes three cases of PMPF in patients following renal transplantation, involving both native and grafted kidneys. Macroscopically, all cases consisted of shrunken kidneys with thinned and atrophic renal parenchyma surrounded by massively hypertrophic perirenal fat with mass-forming nodules, which was in concordance with cross sectional imaging findings acquired before surgery. Histology of the remaining renal parenchyma showed end stage renal disease in all four surgically removed kidneys, with diffuse interstitial fibrosis, tubular atrophy and sclerosed glomeruli. Perirenal adipose tissue consisted of mature fat with areas of significant myxoid and collagenous stromal component, interspersed with bland spindle and stellate-shaped cells. Immunohistochemistry for S100, smooth muscle actin, desmin and IgG4 were negative. No MDM2 gene amplification was identified by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Broad molecular profiling using the FoundationOne®Heme assay revealed no evidence of pathogenic alterations on DNA and RNA levels.

Conclusion

PMPF is a rare benign condition typically associated with chronic kidney disease, occurring late in the course. The radiological findings may be mistaken for those of a malignant tumor, and histopathological examination is required to exclude a malignant neoplasm, in particular a well-differentiated or dedifferentiated liposarcoma of the retroperitoneum. Renal transplant recipients can be affected by PMPF, which can occur in both native and transplanted kidneys several years following renal transplantation.

Introduction

Perinephric myxoid pseudotumor of fat (PMPF) is a relatively recently described pathological entity characterized by tumor-like changes of the perinephric and renal sinus adipose tissue. Histologically, the lesion typically consists of mature adipose tissue, myxoid stroma, bland spindled cells, a mixed inflammatory cell infiltrate and arborizing vessels [1]. PMPF is associated with various chronic kidney diseases, including neoplastic diseases of the kidney, such as renal cell carcinoma and urothelial carcinoma, as well as non-neoplastic chronic kidney diseases, such as end-stage renal failure, diabetes mellitus, ureteral stricture, chronic pyelonephritis and congenital anatomical abnormalities [1,2,3]. The precise pathogenesis of PMPF remains unknown. However, it is hypothesized that PMPF is a reactive process in response to chronic “irritation” of the kidney, either due to the mass effect of neoplasia or the inflammation that frequently accompanies non-neoplastic chronic kidney disease [1].

In 2009, Tanas et al. were the first to describe this condition as “pseudosarcomatous fibroblastic/myofibroblastic proliferation” in perinephric tissue adjacent to renal cell carcinoma in 12 cases [4]. Dashti et al. introduced the term “perinephric myxoid pseudotumor of fat” in 2019 by the identification of similar lesions in perinephric adipose tissue in 11 cases primarily associated with non-neoplastic renal disorders [1]. In 2023, Hogan et al. published a large case collection describing 33 cases of PMPF, the majority of which (82%) were associated with malignancy, such as renal cell carcinoma, and urothelial carcinoma of the renal pelvis [2].

Given its strong association with chronic kidney disease, it is not surprising that PMPF can also manifest in the context of kidney transplantation. Chronic graft failure and end-stage kidney disease is a common scenario in long-term kidney transplant recipients [5]. However, only seven cases of PMPF in kidney transplants have been reported in the literature to date [6, 7, 11] (Table 1). Here we present two more cases of PMPF in transplanted kidneys and one case in which both native kidneys of a transplant patient were affected.

Table 1 Cases of perinephric myxoid pseudotumor of fat reported in the literature

Case presentation

Case 1

was a 63-year-old male patient who underwent double kidney transplantation 28 and 16 years ago for chronic glomerulonephritis. Due to a persistent inflammatory condition of unknown etiology and microhematuria, a CT scan was performed. Two tumorous lesions in both native kidneys were found. The radiological differential diagnosis favored angiomyolipoma, but a malignant neoplasm could not be excluded with certainty. Bilateral nephrectomy of both native kidneys was performed to exclude malignancy and confirmed the diagnosis of PMPF in both kidney resections. Despite the patient’s successful recovery from surgery, he eventually died two weeks later from a myocardial infarction.

Case 2

was a 61-year-old male patient with dialysis-dependent graft failure after double kidney transplantation 28 and 25 years earlier due to mesangioproliferative glomerulonephritis. Sonography and MRI detected an incidental solid and cystic mass in the first transplant kidney. As the lesion was suspicious for neoplasia on imaging, transplant nephrectomy was performed with a postoperative diagnosis of PMPF. Meanwhile, 12 years after the transplant nephrectomy, the patient shows no evidence of disease recurrence and has since undergone a successful re-transplantation.

Case 3

was a 61-year-old male patient who received a kidney transplant 20 years ago for focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. He had been on dialysis for 12 years after chronic graft failure. Due to recurrent pyelonephritis, a CT scan was performed that revealed several suspicious lesions in the transplant kidney. Biopsy showed normal mature adipose tissue next to connective tissue with a bland spindle cell proliferation in a loosely vascularized stroma, with no evidence of malignancy. MDM2 fluorescence in situ hybridization assay of the biopsy excluded amplification of the MDM2 gene. However, the diagnosis of PMPF was not made at the time of biopsy as this entity was not initially considered. Due to persistent graft site discomfort, the patient requested removal of the transplanted kidney and the surgical specimen was diagnosed with PMPF. Currently, the patient shows no complications and no signs of disease recurrence one year after the diagnosis of PMPF and surgery.

Radiological findings

In case 1, a renal mass protocol CT (non-contrast and contrast enhanced) showed a massive thinning of remaining renal parenchyma of both native kidneys, with a width < 4 mm. The perinephric tissue of both kidneys exhibited diffuse hypertrophy with focal nodular remodeling (bilateral masses of 15.0 × 10.0 × 8.0 cm), with an average density of approximately - 60 to -75 Hounsfield units (HU), consistent with lipomatous tissue. The more nodular component displayed increased density (< 15 HU) and demonstrated contrast enhancement, which was suspicious for a malignant process (Fig. 1A).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Radiological and macroscopic appearance of perinephric myxoid pseudotumor of fat (A,C,E) Radiologically, massive thinning of the remaining renal parenchyma (dashed lines) with hypertrophy and partially nodular remodeling of the perinephric tissue (arrowheads) gives the impression of mass-forming lesions. (B,D,F) Nephrectomy specimen show hypertrophied, ill-defined and nodular perirenal fat (arrowheads) adjacent to thinned, atrophic kidney parenchyma (dashed line). (A-B) Case 1: PMPF in both native kidneys (in B only the left larger kidney is shown, however, macroscopic findings of the right kidney were comparable). (C-D) Case 2: PMPF in kidney transplant. (E-F) Case 3: PMPF in kidney transplant

In case 2, a non-contrast CT scan revealed a markedly atrophied parenchyma of the left transplanted kidney, encased in multiple lobulated and round-shaped lesions of low density (< 20 HU), measuring up to 8.9 × 7.0 × 4.0 cm (Fig. 1C). These findings again raised concerns about a malignant neoplastic process.

MR imaging in case 3 demonstrated large lobulated solid lesions up to 4.8 × 2.5 × 1.9 cm adjacent to the poles of the transplanted kidney in the right iliac fossa. Extended degenerative atrophy of the renal parenchyma as well as simple cortical parenchymal cysts (max. 0.6 cm) were observed (Fig. 1E). The perinephric masses showed a marked contrast enhancement and minimal diffusion restriction, so that a malignant process could not be excluded in the differential diagnosis.

Gross examination

In case 1, the explanted native kidneys weighed 667 g (right kidney) and 968 g (left kidney). The parenchyma was thin and atrophic with blurring of the cortico-medullary junction. The perirenal fat of both kidneys was massively hypertrophic and surrounded the shrunken kidneys (Fig. 1B). In case 2, the weight of the kidney was 1280 g, there was only a rim of residual renal parenchyma surrounded by nodular tissue with fatty appearance (Fig. 1D). In case 3, the kidney weighed 420 g. The renal parenchyma was markedly thinned and showed multiple cysts up to 0.6 cm in diameter, with a perirenal fatty mass with mucoid, glassy nodules enclosing the shrunken kidney (Fig. 1F). In all cases, PMPF was characterized by diffuse hyperplasia of the perirenal adipose tissue adjacent to atrophic renal parenchyma, rather than presenting as a sharply demarcated mass.

Histology, immunohistochemistry and molecular analysis

Histology of the remaining renal parenchyma showed end-stage kidney disease in all four surgically removed kidneys, with diffuse interstitial fibrosis, tubular atrophy and sclerosed glomeruli (Fig. 2A-C). Case 3 exhibited multiple cysts lined by flattened and cuboidal cells with clear, foamy or eosinophilic cytoplasm, and few oxalate crystals, consistent with acquired cystic kidney disease. Furthermore, there was chronic active C4d-negative antibody-mediated rejection in the residual parenchyma of case 3, presenting with transplant glomerulitis, transplant glomerulopathy, and chronic allograft arteriopathy. In all cases, perirenal adipose tissue consisted of mature fat as well as areas with a significant myxoid and collagenous stromal component, interspersed with bland spindled and stellate-shaped cells without cytologic atypia (Fig. 2D-J). Patchy chronic inflammation with lymphocytes, plasma cells and CD68 + macrophages was present. In areas of stromal myxoid change, thin-walled arborizing vessels were observed. Mitotic activity and necrosis were absent and there was no evidence of malignancy. Immunohistochemistry for S100, smooth muscle actin, desmin and IgG4 performed on all resections were negative. The Ki-67 proliferation index was < 5%. In all cases, no MDM2 gene amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization was identified (Fig. 2K-M). Broad molecular profiling using the FoundationOne®Heme assay in all three cases did not reveal any pathogenic alterations on DNA (e.g. mutation) and RNA (e.g. fusion) levels.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Histological appearance of perinephric myxoid pseudotumor of fat

(A-C) Renal parenchyma shows the picture of an end-stage-kidney with sclerosis of the glomeruli, interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (✱). PMPF is directly adjacent to the renal capsule () (HE, scale bar = 250 μm). (D-F) PMPF consists of an admixture of mature fat, fibromyxoid stroma and spindled to stellate stromal cells with a variably intense mixed inflammatory cell infiltrate (HE, scale bar = 100 μm). (G-J) Spindled to stellate cells of PMPF without cytological atypia (HE, scale bar = 50 μm). (K-M) MDM2 fluorescence in situ hybridization: No amplification of the MDM2 gene in all three cases (scale bar = 10 μm).

Discussion

Our three cases of PMPF in kidney transplant recipients share many similarities with previously described cases of PMPF. All three patients presented with chronic graft failure and end-stage kidney disease. In all of them, imaging revealed perinephric lesions with a tumor-like appearance, favoring a neoplastic process. Diagnosis of PMPF on imaging is challenging due to the wide range of radiological findings and the limited literature describing the imaging appearance of PMPF. Several potential mimics of malignancy (e.g. liposarcoma) and a wide range of non-neoplastic differential diagnoses, including infectious conditions, cysts, or IgG4-related disease have been reported in the context of PMPF [8,9,10,11]. Radiology has been described as challenging to clearly distinguish between an exophytic process arising from the kidney itself and a lesion arising from perinephric fat [8]. Due to this ambiguity in imaging, histological examination remains the most accurate diagnostic tool for identifying PMPF and is required in the majority of cases to exclude malignancy. This is particularly important for kidney transplant recipients, who are at increased risk of developing malignant tumors in both their native and transplanted kidneys [12, 13]. However, the findings in a biopsy of PMPF may be inconclusive, as PMPF consists of different histological components, not all of which may be seen in the biopsy material. In addition, PMPF is an unusual and rare entity and PMPF might not be considered initially.

The main histological features prompting to the diagnosis of PMPF are a very prominent myxoid stroma with loosely arranged spindle cells without marked atypia and low mitotic activity, interspersed with unsuspicious mature adipose tissue. A mixed inflammatory infiltrate and delicate blood vessels may be present. In our cases, PMPF consisted of tumorous, mass-forming myxo-lipomatous remodeling exclusively of the perirenal tissue, without involvement of the atrophic renal parenchyma itself. This finding is consistent with previously published cases [1, 2]. However, other authors also described extension and infiltration of PMPF into the renal parenchyma [6].

The characteristic myxoid stroma distinguishes PMPF from other potential differential diagnoses, such as retroperitoneal lipoma or angiomyolipoma [14]. However, one of the most important differential diagnostic considerations for a retroperitoneal fat containing lesion is a well-differentiated or dedifferentiated liposarcoma [15, 16]. The morphological spectrum of liposarcoma is wide, including a prominent myxoid appearance [17]. The amplification of the mouse double minute 2 homolog (MDM2) gene is the leading oncogenic pathway and diagnostic hallmark of well-differentiated and dedifferentiated liposarcoma [18]. We and others suggest that a definitive diagnosis of PMPF requires demonstration of absence of MDM2 gene amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis [1]. Myxoid liposarcoma is another mesenchymal malignancy that shares morphological characteristics with PMPF. However, this entity is genetically defined by the presence of DDIT3 gene fusions and appears to be exceedingly rare in the retroperitoneum [19, 20].

Benign differential diagnoses to consider include renal replacement lipomatosis (RRL), renal sinus lipomatosis (RSL) and renal fibrolipomatosis (RFL). These terms are often used synonymously in the literature and refer to a spectrum of entities characterized by varying degrees of accumulation of fatty tissue within the renal sinus and replacement of destroyed renal parenchyma by adipose tissue [21, 22]. While RSL is defined as an only moderate increase in renal sinus fat, RRL and RFL appear to be more severe forms with marked fatty tissue proliferation within the renal sinus, renal atrophy or destruction of the renal parenchyma [23,24,25]. Calculus disease, infection, non-inflammatory chronic kidney diseases and obesity have been discussed as underlying causes [22]. Macroscopic and radiological appearance and some histological features of RRL may be similar to PMPF. However, RRL is histologically composed of fibrofatty tissue with mature adipocytes, but lacks the characteristic myxoid matrix and spindled-cell component of PMPF [26, 27]. Cross-sectional imaging may reveal findings suggestive of either PMPF or RRL/RFL, yet it can usually not confirm either diagnosis definitely. While RRL is generally associated with renal calculi and renal parenchymal destruction, PMPF is considered to be an independent low density mass or masses with HU values ranging from fat-like (negative HU) to slightly higher than water (low positive HU), which may show minimal contrast enhancement. Additionally, chemical shift imaging MRI typically identifies both macroscopic fat masses and fat-suppressed T2-weighted MRI irregularities of myxoid components within suspected PMPF [8, 10, 11]. Of note, imaging features may differ in native and transplanted kidneys [11].

Renal myxoma is another condition that may exhibit morphological overlap with PMPF. This rare kidney tumor has only been reported in a limited number of cases [28,29,30], including one transplant kidney [31]. Typical histological features of renal myxoma include a hypervascular myxoid stroma with spindle cells [29, 32, 33]. However, myxomas typically do not contain mature adipose tissue, which is the main distinguishing factor from PMPF [28, 33].

The prognosis of PMPF is generally benign, and no cases of recurrence or malignant transformation have yet been reported. In our cases, all patients had a favorable immediate post-operative outcome. While one patient died shortly after surgery due to an unrelated illness, the remaining two patients show no signs of disease recurrence in the medium and long term.

In conclusion, PMPF is a benign condition typically associated with end-stage kidney disease, occurring late in the course. Radiological findings may be mistaken for those of a malignant tumor, and a histopathological examination is usually required to rule out a malignant neoplasm, particularly retroperitoneal well- or dedifferentiated liposarcoma. Renal transplant recipients can be affected by PMPF, which can occur in both native and transplanted kidneys.

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Abbreviations

CT:

Computer tomography

DDIT3:

DNA Damage Inducible Transcript 3

FISH:

Fluorescence in situ hybridization

HU:

Hounsfield unit

MDM2:

Mouse double minute 2 homolog

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

PMPF:

Perinephric myxoid pseudotumor of fat

RFL:

Renal fibrolipomatosis

RRL:

Renal replacement lipomatosis

RSL:

Renal sinus lipomatosis

References

  1. Dashti NK, Fritchie KJ, Folpe AL. Perinephric myxoid pseudotumor of fat: a distinctive pseudoneoplasm most often associated with non-neoplastic renal disease. Hum Pathol. 2019;87:37–43. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.humpath.2019.02.005. PMID: 30826321.

  2. Hogan K, McKenney JK, Cox RM, Nguyen JK, Shah RB, Billings SD, Przybycin CG. Myxoid Pseudotumor Involving the Renal Sinus: Clinicopathologic Study of 33 Cases Supporting a Distinct Benign Non-neoplastic Lesion. Am J Surg Pathol. 2023;47(2):218–223. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1097/PAS.0000000000001968. PMID: 36040041.

  3. Liu RW, Tan G, Lim YT, Chua WJ, Cheng A, Wong YM, Lee V, Thamboo T. Perinephric myxoid pseudotumor of fat in a young patient with a horseshoe kidney complicated by an obstructing renal calculus. Asian J Urol. 2023;10(3):382–4. PMID: 37538160; PMCID: PMC10394278.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Tanas MR, Sthapanachai C, Nonaka D, Melamed J, Oliveira AM, Erickson-Johnson MR, Rubin BP. Pseudosarcomatous fibroblastic/myofibroblastic proliferation in perinephric adipose tissue adjacent to renal cell carcinoma: a lesion mimicking well-differentiated liposarcoma. Mod Pathol. 2009;22(9):1196–200. PMID: 19525929. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1038/modpathol.2009.84

  5. Nankivell BJ, Kuypers DR. Diagnosis and prevention of chronic kidney allograft loss. Lancet. 2011;378(9800):1428-37. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60699-5. PMID: 22000139.

  6. Thoeni C, Ordon M, Krizova A, Jakate K, Saleeb RM. Perinephric myxoid pseudotumour of fat - first described case in allograft kidney, a mimicker of malignancy. Histopathology. 2021;79(6):1108–1110. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1111/his.14382. PMID: 33835530.

  7. Pham M, Janiszewski RA, Stanton ML, Nguyen BD. Renal transplants with perinephric myxoid pseudotumor of fat mimicking malignancy. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2022;52(6):654–655. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1093/jjco/hyac038. Erratum in: Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2022;52(11):1358. PMID: 35383369.

  8. Lee J, King KG, Chopra S, Cheng PM. Perinephric myxoid pseudotumor of fat: a multimodality imaging case series. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2023;48(5):1820–1830. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s00261-022-03662-7. Erratum in: Abdom Radiol (NY). 2023;: PMID: 36085375.

  9. Salehipour M, Geramizadeh B, Dastgheib N, Makarem A, Asadollah Poor A, Taheri N. Renal myxoma, a case report and review of the literature. Urol Case Rep. 2018;23:21–2. PMID: 30505691; PMCID: PMC6259043.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen F, Desai MA, Cernigliaro JG, Edgar MA, Alexander LF. Perinephric myxoid pseudotumor of fat: A very rare entity that can mimic a renal cyst and retroperitoneal liposarcoma on imaging. Clin Imaging. 2021;69:139–144. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.clinimag.2020.06.041. PMID: 32731105.

  11. Broski SM, Knight JA, Larsen BT, Folpe AL, Wenger DE. Imaging features of perinephric myxoid pseudotumors of fat. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2024 Apr 13. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s00261-024-04294-9. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 38615061.

  12. Jung SW, Lee H, Cha JM. Risk of malignancy in kidney transplant recipients: a nationwide population-based cohort study. BMC Nephrol. 2022;23(1):160. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12882-022-02796-6. PMID: 35484531; PMCID: PMC9047256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dahle DO, Skauby M, Langberg CW, Brabrand K, Wessel N, Midtvedt K. Renal cell carcinoma and kidney transplantation: a narrative review. Transplantation. 2022;106(1):e52–63. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1097/TP.0000000000003762. PMID: 33741842; PMCID: PMC8667800.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Rha SE, Byun JY, Jung SE, Oh SN, Choi YJ, Lee A, Lee JM. The renal sinus: pathologic spectrum and multimodality imaging approach. Radiographics. 2004;24 Suppl 1:S117-31. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1148/rg.24si045503. PMID: 15486236.

  15. Rioja P, Valencia G, Centurión-Rodriguez C, Morante Z, Bravo M, Huanca L, Morante C. Renal liposarcoma: case report and review of systemic treatment. Ecancermedicalscience. 2021;15:1173. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3332/ecancer.2021.1173. PMID: 33680087; PMCID: PMC7929774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sioletic S, Dal Cin P, Fletcher CD, Hornick JL. Well-differentiated and dedifferentiated liposarcomas with prominent myxoid stroma: analysis of 56 cases. Histopathology. 2013;62(2):287–93. PMID: 23020289. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1111/j.1365-2559.2012.04348.x

  17. Matthyssens LE, Creytens D, Ceelen WP. Retroperitoneal liposarcoma: current insights in diagnosis and treatment. Front Surg. 2015;2:4. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3389/fsurg.2015.00004. PMID: 25713799; PMCID: PMC4322543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Oliner JD, Pietenpol JA, Thiagalingam S, Gyuris J, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B. Oncoprotein MDM2 conceals the activation domain of tumour suppressor p53. Nature. 1993;362(6423):857–60. PMID: 8479525. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1038/362857a0

  19. Setsu N, Miyake M, Wakai S, Nakatani F, Kobayashi E, Chuman H, Hiraoka N, Kawai A, Yoshida A. Primary Retroperitoneal Myxoid Liposarcomas. Am J Surg Pathol. 2016;40(9):1286–90. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1097/PAS.0000000000000657. PMID: 27158758; PMCID: PMC5029446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. De Vreeze RS, de Jong D, Tielen IH, Ruijter HJ, Nederlof PM, Haas RL, van Coevorden F. Primary retroperitoneal myxoid/round cell liposarcoma is a nonexisting disease: an immunohistochemical and molecular biological analysis. Mod Pathol. 2009;22(2):223–31. PMID: 18820664. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1038/modpathol.2008.164

  21. Ambos MA, Bosniak MA, Gordon R, Madayag MA. Replacement lipomatosis of the kidney. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1978;130(6):1087-91. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.2214/ajr.130.6.1087. PMID: 418645.

  22. Gildenhorn HL. Renal replacement lipomatosis. Review and case report. JAMA. 1962;181:994-7. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1001/jama.1962.03050370062017a. PMID: 13898569.

  23. Laouad I, Büchler M, Weestel PF, Lebranchu Y, Legendre C, Choukroun G, Thervet E. Replacement kidney lipomatosis after renal transplantation. Transplantation. 2005;79(4):496-8. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1097/01.tp.0000151002.36566.0b. PMID: 15729179.

  24. Karasick S, Wechsler RJ. Case 23: replacement lipomatosis of the kidney. Radiology. 2000;215(3):754-6. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1148/radiology.215.3.r00jn41754. PMID: 10831695.

  25. Yağci C, Koşucu P, Yörübulut M, Akyar S. Renal replacement lipomatosis: ultrasonography and computed tomography findings. Eur Radiol. 1999;9(8):1599–601. PMID: 10525874. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s003300050893

  26. Collins K, Brocken E, Warmke LM, Tirkes T, Hwang M. Renal replacement lipomatosis presenting in the setting of Ureteral stricture with absence of Renal Calculus Disease. Case Rep Pathol. 2021;2021:3640167. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1155/2021/3640167. PMID: 34725576; PMCID: PMC8557040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bhat G, Barude V, Anuradha S, Tembadamani V, Hegde S. Idiopathic renal replacement lipomatosis: a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. Turk J Surg. 2018;34(3):250–2. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.5152/turkjsurg.2017.3387. PMID: 30302433; PMCID: PMC6173602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hudairy R, Buksh O, Akram R, Alammari A, Al-Maghrabi J, Almansouri Z. Renal myxoma - a case report of a rare kidney tumor, its differential diagnosis and literature review. IJU Case Rep. 2022;5(3):207–10. PMID: 35509776; PMCID: PMC9057751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Suthar KS, Vanikar AV, Patel RD, Kanodia KV. Renal Myxoma- A Rare Variety of Benign Genitourinary Tumour. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9(10):ED11–2. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.7860/JCDR/2015/15351.6631. PMID: 26557531; PMCID: PMC4625250.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Melamed J, Reuter VE, Erlandson RA, Rosai J. Renal myxoma. A report of two cases and review of the literature. Am J Surg Pathol. 1994;18(2):187–94. PMID: 8291657.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Tutman JJ, Rao AG, Hill JG, Crowley CD. Renal myxoma in a pediatric transplant recipient. J Radiol Case Rep. 2017;11(11):20–7. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3941/jrcr.v11i11.3180. PMID: 29296167; PMCID: PMC5741352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Tenkorang S, Kharbach Y, Omana JP, Efared B, Mellas S, Tazi MF, Sekal M, Harmouch T, Khallouk A, El Fassi JM, El Ammari JE, Farih MH. Myxoma of the kidney - an unusual benign renal tumor: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2017;11(1):41. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s13256-016-1194-y. PMID: 28193294; PMCID: PMC5307835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Shanbhogue KP, Ramani N, Surabhi VR, Balasubramanya R, Prasad SR. Tumefactive Nonneoplastic Proliferative Pseudotumors of the Kidneys and Urinary Tract: CT and MRI Findings with Histopathologic Correlation. Radiographics. 2023;43(12):e230071. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1148/rg.230071. PMID: 37971934.

  34. Collins K, Muldoon JL, Warmke LM, Idrees MT. Differential and Ancillary Testing in the diagnosis of Perinephric Myxoid Pseudotumor of Fat: a Case Report and Review of the literature. AJSP: Reviews Rep. 1/2 2022;27(1):18–21. 10.1097.

  35. Amato M, Piazza P, Ferrari I, Biolcati S, Franceschini T, Puliatti S, Micali S, Manferrari F. Rare perinephric myxoid pseudotumor of fat causing ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a case report. CEN Case Rep. 2023;12(2):210–4. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s13730-022-00746-7. Epub 2022 Nov 15. PMID: 36378461; PMCID: PMC10151429.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Ortiz-Rey JA, García-Baizán A, Bellas-Pereira A, Barciela-Bastos A, Gómez-de María C, Conde-Ferreirós M. Myxoid Pseudotumor Changes Affecting the Distal Ureter Associated With Urothelial Carcinoma In Situ. Int J Surg Pathol. 2024;32(4):772–775. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1177/10668969231188894. PMID: 37525552.

  37. Kallen ME, Drachenberg CB, Legesse TB. Lesson of the Month: perinephric myxoid pseudotumor of fat co-occurring with polycystic kidney disease. Histopathology. 2024;85(3):521–522. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1111/his.15210. PMID: 38708908.

  38. Wu Q, Baraban E, Gross JM. Perinephric myxoid pseudotumor of fat: A series of 13 cases and literature review. Hum Pathol. 2024 Nov 12:105681. doi: 10.1016. PMID: 39536981.

Download references

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or non-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

CS: Conceptualization (supporting); project administration (equal); visualization (lead); writing – original draft (lead). AG: Conceptualization (equal); supervision (lead); validation (equal); writing – original draft (supporting); writing – review and editing (lead). MB: Providing clinical data (lead); review and editing (equal). FAH: Providing radiological data (lead); review and editing (equal). CP: Providing molecular data (lead); review and editing (equal). BMH, TF, BBL: Writing – review and editing (equal). All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ariana Gaspert.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent for publication

This case series has been assembled in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from patients 2 and 3 for publication. Patient 1 died more than 12 years ago and no relatives could be contacted at this time.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schnoz, C., Bonani, M., Huber, F.A. et al. Perinephric myxoid pseudotumor of fat – histopathological and molecular characterization of 3 cases after renal transplantation. Diagn Pathol 20, 25 (2025). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s13000-025-01615-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s13000-025-01615-4

Keywords